From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connor v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1933
169 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1933)

Opinion

(Filed 10 May, 1933.)

APPEAL by defendant from Warlick, J., at November Term, 1932, of MECKLENBURG. Affirmed.

G. T. Carswell and Joe W. Ervin for plaintiff.

J. D. McCall for defendant.


This was a motion to set aside a judgment for excusable neglect. C. S., 600. The trial court found the facts and set them out in the judgment. Among these is the finding that the procedure of the plaintiff was regular and in full compliance with the law and that there was no mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect on the part of the defendant. Judgment

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Connor v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 1, 1933
169 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1933)
Case details for

Connor v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:J. W. CONNOR v. R. WALTER ROBINSON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 1, 1933

Citations

169 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1933)
169 S.E. 926

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Long

Reversed. Cited: Croom v. Murphy, 179 N.C. 395 (2c); Hipp v. DuPont, 182 N.C. 13 (2c); Hinnant v. Power Co.,…