From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Connelly v. Balkwill

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 14, 1960
279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960)

Opinion

No. 13981.

April 14, 1960.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Cleveland; Charles J. McNamee, Judge.

Harold K. Bell, and Robert E. Williamson, Lakewood, Ohio, for appellants.

Everett D. McCurdy and Lincoln Reavis of Spieth, Bell McCurdy, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief.

Charles D. Johnson, of Baker, Hoststler Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

William B. Brooks, in pro. per., Chicago, Ill., E.S. Cummings, Jr. of Cummings Wyman, Chicago, Ill., on the brief.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Judge, and CECIL and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.


The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and the same is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge McNamee granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment, reported in Connelly v. Balkwill, 174 F. Supp. 49.


Summaries of

Connelly v. Balkwill

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 14, 1960
279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960)
Case details for

Connelly v. Balkwill

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence E. CONNELLY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George W. BALKWILL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 14, 1960

Citations

279 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1960)

Citing Cases

Ockerman v. May Zima & Co.

We applied the fraud statute without discussion in the first Ohio decision under Rule 10b-5. Connelly v.…

Nickels v. Koehler Management Corp.

The question whether the Ohio blue sky period of limitations or fraud period would better implement the…