Conn. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Drown

Full title: CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Joshua DROWN et al.

Court: Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 30, 2012

44 A.3d 183 (Conn. 2012)

305 Conn. 908

Opinion

2012-05-30

CONNECTICUT INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION v. Joshua DROWN et al.

Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition. Thomas P. O'Connor, Greenwich, and Charles W. Pleterse, in opposition.

Sean K. McElligott, Bridgeport, in support of the petition. Thomas P. O'Connor, Greenwich, and Charles W. Pleterse, in opposition.

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 140, 37 A.3d 820, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that exclusion (i) of the Medical Inter–Insurance Exchange (MIIX) policy unambiguously excluded coverage in this case?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Association had immunity for the actions of MIIX committed prior to MIIX's insolvency?”