From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Conklin v. Zant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 17, 1992
414 S.E.2d 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

A92A0123.

DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1992.

Action for damages. Butts Superior Court. Before Judge Smith.

Robert Conklin, pro se. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, for appellees.


Plaintiff Conklin is a death row inmate at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center while defendant Zant is the warden of that prison and defendant John Doe is the surety on defendant Zant's official bond. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that without his authorization or permission, defendant Zant seized funds from his inmate account. The complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the theft or conversion of plaintiff's funds. Plaintiff, as pro se, appeals the dismissal of his action wherein the trial court stated that plaintiff's action was dismissed "pursuant to O.C.G.A. Section 42-2-11 (c) as the Plaintiff has failed to exhaust all administrative remedies available." Held:

We are not aware of any administrative procedure which affords the relief sought by plaintiff. A plaintiff is not barred from relief by his failure to exhaust administrative remedies where those remedies are inadequate. Wilson v. Ledbetter, 260 Ga. 180, 181 (1c) ( 390 S.E.2d 846).

Judgment reversed. Sognier, C. J., and Cooper, J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 17, 1992.


Summaries of

Conklin v. Zant

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 17, 1992
414 S.E.2d 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Conklin v. Zant

Case Details

Full title:CONKLIN v. ZANT et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 17, 1992

Citations

414 S.E.2d 741 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
414 S.E.2d 741

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Georgia Dept. of Med. Assist

Executive argues that exhaustion of administrative remedies is not required when such relief is inadequate or…

In the Interest of A. V. B

Moreover, the relief which GAO sought was a judicial determination of deprivation with the hope that the…