Summary
In Wilson v. Conklin, 22 Iowa 452, 454, after a premature redemption by a junior lienholder, a subsequent lienholder made a (pretended) redemption by paying the clerk only the amount due on the original sale certificate, contending that when said former redemption was made the prior lienholder "could not then make redemption, for that this was within six months from the date of the sale, during which time the right of redemption is exclusively in the judgment debtor."
Summary of this case from Waterloo Sav. Bk. v. CarpenterOpinion
Argued May 17, 1927 —
Decided October 17, 1927.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 163.
For the appellants, Elmer W. Romine.
For the respondent, Charles A. Rathbun.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.