From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coniglio v. Coniglio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 27, 1979
370 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 78-13.

April 27, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sumter County, Ernest C. Aulls, Jr., J.

James A. Shook and S. Ray Gill, Ocala, for appellant.

T. Richard Hagin of Getzen Hagin, Bushnell, for appellee.


This appeal is from a post judgment of dissolution order of the trial judge granting the husband certain modifications of the monthly payments payable to the wife. We reverse in part.

Based upon his previous judgment of dissolution and the stipulation of the parties upon which it was predicated, the trial judge properly found that all of the monthly payments to the wife were an inseparable part of "a true property settlement agreement." The wife transferred to the husband all of her interest in the substantial real estate holdings of the parties in return for the financial payments to her or in her behalf. The trial court could not reduce the monthly payments payable to the wife and it properly declined to do so as to future payments. See Rubio v. Rubio, 347 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Mills v. Mills, 339 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

That part of the order of modification which reduced the arrearages for past unpaid payments of the husband to the wife was improper and is, therefore, reversed and remanded for the entry of a judgment for the full amount of the arrearages.

GRIMES, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.


Summaries of

Coniglio v. Coniglio

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 27, 1979
370 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Coniglio v. Coniglio

Case Details

Full title:MARY JOAN CONIGLIO, APPELLANT, v. C. JOHN CONIGLIO, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 27, 1979

Citations

370 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Stevens v. Stevens

He argues, however, that the trial court erred in allowing her to retain the sums over and above the $50,000…