From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Congdon v. Hersey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 1, 1852
2 R.I. 153 (R.I. 1852)

Opinion

MARCH TERM, 1852.

The Supreme Court, after reversing a decree of a Court of Probate dismissing an application for the appointment of a guardian, will not themselves appoint the guardian, but remand the case to the Court of Probate for that purpose.

THIS was an appeal from a decree of the Court of Probate of Cranston, dismissing the application of the appellant, the Overseer of the Poor of said town, for the appointment of a guardian of the person and estate of Francis Hersey. The ground of the application was that said Hersey, from want of discretion in managing his estate, was likely to bring himself and family to want, and thereby to render himself and family chargeable.


The court being of opinion that said Hersey was a person who was likely to bring himself and family to want, and render himself and family chargeable, refused themselves to appoint a guardian, but remanded the case to the Court of Probate, with directions to appoint a guardian forthwith.


Summaries of

Congdon v. Hersey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jan 1, 1852
2 R.I. 153 (R.I. 1852)
Case details for

Congdon v. Hersey

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL S. CONGDON v. FRANCIS HERSEY

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jan 1, 1852

Citations

2 R.I. 153 (R.I. 1852)

Citing Cases

McKenna v. McKenna

The question to be decided was the validity of the service of the citation. In the case of Congdon v. Hersey,…