From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Compton v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2012
CASE NO.: CV-12-1414-R (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: CV-12-1414-R

08-09-2012

TITLE: LESLIE R. COMPTON v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: Not present ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: Not present


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PRESENT:

HON. MANUEL L. REAL , JUDGE

+-------------------------------+ ¦William Horrell ¦N/A ¦ +----------------+--------------¦ ¦Deputy Clerk ¦Court Reporter¦ +-------------------------------+

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:

Not present

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not present
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution

THIS MATTER IS SET ON CALENDAR FOR HEARING ON AUGUST 20, 2012 AT 11:00 A.M. FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO FILE PROPER PROOFS OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON ALL DEFENDANTS.

PRESENCE OF COUNSEL AT THE HEARING IS MANDATORY; FAILURE TO ATTEND WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. cc: counsel of record


Summaries of

Compton v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2012
CASE NO.: CV-12-1414-R (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Compton v. California

Case Details

Full title:TITLE: LESLIE R. COMPTON v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 9, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: CV-12-1414-R (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Shimer

Moreover, the recognition of a loss to the guarantor merely because of a failure of the lender's rights…

United States v. Marxen

As no proof was made of any claim for reimbursement, such a claim is not involved.Cf. Leslie v. Compton, 103…