From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Competitor Liaison Bureau v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Nov 7, 2011
Case No. 6:08-cv-2165-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 6:08-cv-2165-Orl-28GJK.

November 7, 2011


ORDER


This case is before the Court on Defendant's Motion and Incorporated Memorandum in Support of Its Application for Costs and Attached Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 144) filed April 22, 2011. The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the motion be granted in part and denied in part.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Report and Recommendation filed October 17, 2011 (Doc. No. 158) is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.

2. Defendant's Motion and Incorporated Memorandum in Support of Its Application for Costs and Attached Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 144) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

3. Costs are awarded in favor of Cessna Aircraft Company and against Competitor Liaison Bureau, Inc. and NASCAR, Inc. in the total amount of $39,373.63.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Competitor Liaison Bureau v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Nov 7, 2011
Case No. 6:08-cv-2165-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Competitor Liaison Bureau v. Cessna Aircraft Co.

Case Details

Full title:COMPETITOR LIAISON BUREAU, INC., NASCAR, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CESSNA…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Nov 7, 2011

Citations

Case No. 6:08-cv-2165-Orl-28GJK (M.D. Fla. Nov. 7, 2011)

Citing Cases

Oden v. Vilsack

Generally, "when challenging whether [deposition exhibit copy] costs are properly taxable, the burden lies…

Crouch v. Teledyne Cont'l Motors, Inc.

Generally, "when challenging whether [deposition exhibit copy] costs are properly taxable, the burden lies…