From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Yocham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 30, 1975
464 Pa. 223 (Pa. 1975)

Opinion

Argued October 7, 1974.

Decided October 30, 1975.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset County, Nos. 118 119 Criminal, 1971, Charles C. Coffroth, and T. F. Lansberry, JJ.

James B. Yelovich, A. M. Matthews and James, B. Yelovich, Somerset, John P. Joyce, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

Frederick F. Coffroth, Dist. Atty., Somerset, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


The appellant Rickie Allan Yocham, was convicted of murder in the first degree, robbery, and conspiracy. After the denial of post-verdict motions and the sentencing of appellant, he filed an appeal to this Court contending (1) that those portions of his confession containing references to his commission of other crimes should not have been admitted into evidence; (2) that the admission of the typewritten confession signed by the appellant violated the best evidence rule; and (3) that the jury should have been given a requested charge concerning appellant's alleged withdrawal from the criminal activity. We have examined each of the three issues raised and find them to be without merit.

Judgments of sentence affirmed.

JONES, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Yocham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 30, 1975
464 Pa. 223 (Pa. 1975)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Yocham

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Rickie Allan YOCHAM, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 30, 1975

Citations

464 Pa. 223 (Pa. 1975)
346 A.2d 297

Citing Cases

Com. v. Yocham

This Court affirmed judgments of sentence. Commonwealth v. Yocham, 464 Pa. 223, 346 A.2d 297 (1975).…

Com. v. Yocham

We have examined each of the three issues raised and find them to be without merit." Commonwealth v. Yocham,…