From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Williams

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 12, 2018
No. 59 EM 2018 (Pa. Jun. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 59 EM 2018

06-12-2018

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. ROBERT WILLIAMS, Petitioner


DISSENTING STATEMENT

I dissent from the Court's order denying Robert Williams' Emergency Application for King's Bench Jurisdiction and would grant the requested relief of reassignment to President Judge Shelia Woods-Skipper. I believe Judge Genece Brinkley should have disqualified herself pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 903(C) (providing PCRA trial judge should disqualify themselves in the interests of justice) as her continued involvement has created an appearance of impropriety that tends to undermine public confidence in the judiciary. See Commonwealth v. White, 910 A.2d 648, 657 (Pa. 2006) (explaining that, even in those instances where a jurist can impartially consider a case, the judge must also consider whether his or her continued involvement "creates an appearance of impropriety and/or would tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary").

Justice Todd joins this dissenting statement.

Justice Donohue joins this dissenting statement.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Williams

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jun 12, 2018
No. 59 EM 2018 (Pa. Jun. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. ROBERT WILLIAMS, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

Citations

No. 59 EM 2018 (Pa. Jun. 12, 2018)