From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 26, 2019
203 A.3d 210 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 451 EAL 2018

02-26-2019

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Brahim SMITH, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict Petitioner for violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105 because he was specifically convicted under § 6105(c), and the Commonwealth failed to prove that he was a "fugitive from justice" as that term is meant in § 6105(c)?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Smith

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 26, 2019
203 A.3d 210 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. BRAHIM SMITH, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 26, 2019

Citations

203 A.3d 210 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Smith

Did not the Superior Court err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict [appellant] for violating 18…