From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Small

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 23, 2019
207 A.3d 289 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 559 EAL 2018

04-23-2019

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Elwood SMALL, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Where Small did not receive notice of his co-defendant Larry Bell's 1993 PCRA hearing, and where Small has been continuously incarcerated, with only limited assistance of counsel on unrelated claims since that time, was Bell's PCRA testimony "unknown" to Small under Commonwealth v. Burton[, 638 Pa. 687, 158 A.3d 618 (2017)]?
(2) Has Small otherwise satisfied the requirements for an exception to the PCRA time-bar under [42 Pa.C.S.] § 9545(b)(1)(ii) based on his co-defendant Bell's PCRA testimony, such that the PCRA court's grant of a new trial should be reinstated?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Small

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Apr 23, 2019
207 A.3d 289 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Small

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. ELWOOD SMALL, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

207 A.3d 289 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Small

Specifically, we granted review to consider, inter alia, whether "Bell's PCRA testimony [was] 'unknown' to…

Commonwealth v. Small

For one thing, the question upon which we granted review as to this issue is more limited than the majority…