From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Shower

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 8, 2015
112 A.3d 1210 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 339 MAL 2014

2015-04-08

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Wayne Patrick SHOWER, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether the Superior Court's application of its decision Commonwealth v. Hainesworth to the instant cases impermissibly expanded the contract clause to bind the Commonwealth to collateral consequences over which the Commonwealth has no control?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Shower

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Apr 8, 2015
112 A.3d 1210 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Shower

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. WAYNE PATRICK SHOWER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

112 A.3d 1210 (Pa. 2015)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Zeldich

Prothonotary Date: 12/7/2015Commonwealth v. Martinez, 112 A.3d 1207 (Pa. 2015); see also Commonwealth v.…