From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Mills

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jul 19, 2016
141 A.3d 1275 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 124 EAL 2016.

07-19-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent, v. Leon MILLS, Petitioner.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did not the trial court properly grant [P]etitioner's motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial “delay,” and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [P]etitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [P]etitioner was brought to trial?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Mills

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Jul 19, 2016
141 A.3d 1275 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Mills

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. LEON MILLS, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 19, 2016

Citations

141 A.3d 1275 (Pa. 2016)