Opinion
No. 124 EAL 2016.
07-19-2016
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Did not the trial court properly grant [P]etitioner's motion to dismiss pursuant to Pa.R.Crim.P. 600, where the time form a scheduling conference to a status listing consisted of time attributable to the conventional progression of a criminal case and was not judicial “delay,” and was therefore correctly included in the calculation of the 365 days in which to bring [P]etitioner to trial, and thus where more than 365 days elapsed before [P]etitioner was brought to trial?