From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. King

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 1973
303 A.2d 926 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1973)

Opinion

Argued April 6, 1973

April 26, 1973.

Motor vehicles — Suspension of motor vehicle operator's license — The Vehicle Code, Act 1959, April 29, P. L. 58 — Chemical breath test — Refusal of breath test — Advising of rights.

1. Provisions of The Vehicle Code, Act 1959, April 29, P. L. 58, authorize the suspension of a motor vehicle operator's license for refusal to submit to a chemical breath test lawfully requested. [454-5]

2. Provisions of The Vehicle Code, Act 1959, April 29, P. L. 58, do not require that a motor vehicle operator, lawfully requested to submit to a chemical breath test, be advised that refusal to submit to such a test may result in suspension of his motor vehicle operator's license. [455]

Argued April 6, 1973, before Judges MENCER, ROGERS and BLATT, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 5 C.D. 1971, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. John King, No. 11056 of 1970.

Suspension of motor vehicle operator's license by Secretary of Transportation. Licensee appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County. Appeal sustained. Commonwealth appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Order vacated and record remanded.

Stuart A. Liner, Assistant Attorney General, with him Anthony J. Maiorana, Assistant Attorney General, Robert W. Cunliffe, Deputy Attorney General, and Israel Packel, Attorney General, for appellant.

Charles F. Mayer, for appellee.


A police officer of Aldan Borough, Delaware County, arrested the appellee, John King, and charged him with operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Upon receiving a certified report that Mr. King had failed to submit to a chemical test of his breath, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation suspended Mr. King's operating privileges for a period of six months, as authorized by Section 624.1(a) of The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 624.1(a). Mr. King's appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County was sustained. The Commonwealth has appealed here.

The lower court sustained Mr. King's appeal on the ground of the police officer's admitted failure to advise the appellee that a failure to submit to the test might result in a suspension of his operator's license. This occurred before our decision in Commonwealth v. Abraham, 7 Pa. Commw. 535, 300 A.2d 831 (1973), where we held that: "Since the Pennsylvania statute [Section 624.1(a)] does not require that the operator be advised that his license may be suspended for refusal to take the test, we therefore conclude that there is no obligation on the part of the police officer to so advise the operator."

We cannot simply reverse, however, because the record discloses that the appellee also defended below on the ground that he was not asked to take the test, as the police officer declared. Since the court below did not reach this issue, we must remand for its and determination.

The order appealed from is vacated; and the record remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. King

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 26, 1973
303 A.2d 926 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1973)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. King

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. King

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 26, 1973

Citations

303 A.2d 926 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1973)
303 A.2d 926

Citing Cases

Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.

Nor is an order, judgment or decree final unless it terminates the litigation between the parties from…

Boyle, v. Dept. Trans

His lack of awareness of such a consequence, however, clearly does not relieve him of this civil penalty.…