Summary
In Howzell, the claim was that the prosecution had failed to present evidence of value; and such determination of value was for the jury.
Summary of this case from Com. v. MathisOpinion
Argued March 21, 1978.
June 28, 1978.
Indictments charging defendant with burglary, theft by unlawful taking and conspiracy. Before McDERMOTT, J. Verdict of not guilty of burglary and guilty of remaining charges and judgment of sentence entered. Defendant appealed. Appeal, No. 1271, Oct. T., 1977, from Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, Sept. T., 1976, Nos. 966 and 967. Argued March 21, 1978.
Mark Stephen Syrnick, for appellant;
Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, submitted a brief for Commonwealth, appellee.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
HOFFMAN, J., dissented.
SPAETH, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.