treating the defendant's motion to compel production of documents in his case as a PCRA petition
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. StahlNo. 973 WDA 2020
07-01-2021
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Arthur Lamont HENDERSON, Appellant
Affirmed.
treating the defendant's motion to compel production of documents in his case as a PCRA petition
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. StahlFull title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ARTHUR LAMONT HENDERSON Appellant
Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Date published: Jul 1, 2021
Thus, his filing is properly characterized as a PCRA petition. See Commonwealth v. Henderson, 260 A.3d…
Commonwealth v. StahlAppellant's filing was titled, "Pro Se Motion to Compel Release of Trial and PCRA Counsel's Files," which…