From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Hart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 9, 1970
269 A.2d 740 (Pa. 1970)

Opinion

Submitted April 20, 1970.

October 9, 1970.

Criminal Law — Practice — Plea — Guilty — Burden of proof that plea was not voluntarily entered — Silent record — Case tried before Commonwealth ex rel. West v. Rundle.

Where a defendant entered a plea of guilty in a case tried before the decision in Commonwealth ex rel. West v. Rundle, 428 Pa. 102, and the record is silent as to what transpired when he entered his plea, the burden is upon him in a collateral proceeding to prove that his plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered.

Before BELL, C. J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

Appeal, No. 194, Jan. T., 1970, from order of Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, July T., 1963, No. 1738, in case of Commonwealth v. Robert Lee Hart. Order affirmed.

Petition for post-conviction relief. Before DIBONA, J.

Petition denied. Petitioner appealed.

Joseph Litt, for appellant.

Romer Holleran and James T. Owens, Assistant District Attorneys, James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


On November 27, 1963, appellant pleaded guilty to murder generally. Following a degree of guilt hearing, he was found guilty of murder in the second degree, and was sentenced to a term of six to twelve years in prison. No appeal was taken. On April 10, 1969, appellant filed a petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act, alleging that he was unconstitutionally denied his right to appeal, and that his guilty plea was not knowingly and intelligently entered. After the Commonwealth's motion that he summarily be given the right to file post-trial motions was granted, an evidentiary hearing, with counsel, was held, and the motions were denied. This appeal followed and we affirm.

The sole issue raised by appellant is whether his plea was knowingly and intelligently entered. The evidence produced at the PCHA hearing indicated that trial counsel advised appellant to plead guilty, and that counsel felt appellant would most likely receive a sentence "consistent with the maximum sentence for voluntary manslaughter" — i.e., six to twelve years. While appellant testified that he believed he was pleading guilty to voluntary manslaughter, we agree with the hearing court that on this record this mistake does not necessarily mean that appellant did not enter a knowing and intelligent plea.

The hearing court found as a fact that appellant's plea was knowingly and intelligently entered. Despite the fact that this is a silent record case, the burden in this collateral proceeding still remains with appellant. See Commonwealth v. McBride, 440 Pa. 81, 269 A.2d 737 (1970); Commonwealth v. Cushnie, 433 Pa. 131, 135-36, 249 A.2d 290, 293 (1969). There being no abuse of discretion shown, the hearing court's factual finding will therefore be accepted.

The judgment of sentence of the Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, Criminal Section, of Philadelphia is affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Hart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 9, 1970
269 A.2d 740 (Pa. 1970)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Hart, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 9, 1970

Citations

269 A.2d 740 (Pa. 1970)
269 A.2d 740

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Waddy

However, the appellant has offered no evidence other than his own testimony to support his position, and the…

Commonwealth v. McNeill

Therefore, considering the existence of the on-the-record plea agreement, together with appellant's right to…