From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Butler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 1978
395 A.2d 1015 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)

Opinion

Submitted December 6, 1977.

November 3, 1978.

Indictments charging defendant with robbery and theft by extortion. Before MARSHALL, J., without a jury. Defendant found guilty of theft by extortion and not guilty of robbery and judgment of sentence entered. Defendant filed petition under Post Conviction Hearing Act, and order entered allowing defendant to appeal, nunc pro tunc, order by BLAKE, J. Defendant appealed. Appeal, No. 664, Oct. T., 1977, from Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division, of Philadelphia, Oct. T., 1975, No. 34. Submitted December 6, 1977.

Robert A. Newman, for appellant; Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


The instant appeal is quashed without prejudice to any rights appellant may otherwise have pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act, 19 P. S. § 1180-1 et seq. (Supp. 1977). See, Commonwealth v. Valezquez, 244 Pa. Super. 327, 368 A.2d 745 (1976).

WATKINS, former P.J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Butler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 1978
395 A.2d 1015 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Butler, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 1978

Citations

395 A.2d 1015 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1978)
395 A.2d 1015

Citing Cases

Com. v. Miranda

See also Commonwealth v. Pettus, 492 Pa. 558, 424 A.2d 1332 (1981). To date, only two cases apply the…

Com. v. Harper

When the PCHA court circumvents this process and merely grants an appeal nunc pro tunc, our court has quashed…