From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Brabham

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 25, 2016
132 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 679 EAL 2015

02-25-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Benjamin BRABHAM, Petitioner.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED on a limited basis, solely pertaining to the issues of whether Petitioner's sentence violates the prohibition against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). As a result of the recent holding by that Court that Miller must be applied retroactively by the States, see Montgomery v. Louisiana, ––– U.S. ––––, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), the Superior Court's order is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Montgomery. Allocatur is DENIED in all other respects.

To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States which it deems to be retroactive. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii).

Justices EAKIN and DONOHUE did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Brabham

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 25, 2016
132 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Brabham

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. BENJAMIN BRABHAM, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 25, 2016

Citations

132 A.3d 985 (Pa. 2016)