holding that an arbitrator's failure to disclose a substantial relationship with a party or a party's attorney, i.e., a relationship substantial enough to create a reasonable impression of bias, justifies vacatur under the federal "evident partiality" standard
Summary of this case from Speidel v. St. Francis HospitalNo. 14.
February 24, 1969, OCTOBER TERM, 1968.
Rehearing Denied.
holding that an arbitrator's failure to disclose a substantial relationship with a party or a party's attorney, i.e., a relationship substantial enough to create a reasonable impression of bias, justifies vacatur under the federal "evident partiality" standard
Summary of this case from Speidel v. St. Francis HospitalFull title:COMMONWEALTH COATINGS CORP. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. ET AL., ante, p…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Feb 24, 1969
III. THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE, PUBLIC POLICY — ARBITRATOR SEN'S RELATIONSHIP WITH FCI IDI asserts that…
Richco Structures v. Parkside Village, Inc.In requiring full disclosure we are in accord with the United States Supreme Court's construction of the…