From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioners' Court of Winston County v. Haney

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 4, 1928
118 So. 238 (Ala. 1928)

Opinion

6 Div. 215.

October 4, 1928.

O. D. Street Son, of Birmingham, for petitioners.

Arthur Fite, of Jasper, opposed.


Petition of the Commissioners' Court of Winston County for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Commissioners' Court of Winston Co. v. Haney, 22 Ala. App. 571, 118 So. 237.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur, except ANDERSON, C. J., who dissents; his view being that the act in question is violative of section 96 and subdivision 24 of section 104 of the Constitution.


Summaries of

Commissioners' Court of Winston County v. Haney

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 4, 1928
118 So. 238 (Ala. 1928)
Case details for

Commissioners' Court of Winston County v. Haney

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONERS' COURT OF WINSTON COUNTY v. John W. HANEY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 4, 1928

Citations

118 So. 238 (Ala. 1928)
118 So. 238

Citing Cases

Court of County Commissioners v. Lightner

The argument that the act is violative of sections 96, 281, 68, and subdivision 24 of section 104 of our…

Evans v. Long

The act is here assailed by respondent as violative of section 105 of our present Constitution, and…