Opinion
7315 7316 7317 7318 Index 652625/16
10-11-2018
COMMERCIAL TENANT SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BARCLAY'S SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant–Respondent.
Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York (Robert S. Smith of counsel), for appellant. O'Brien LLP, New York (Sean R. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.
Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York (Robert S. Smith of counsel), for appellant.
O'Brien LLP, New York (Sean R. O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Kahn, Oing, JJ.
Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered on or about November 29, 2017, on or about March 19, 2018, and on or about June 29, 2018, unanimously dismissed, without costs.
While there is no impediment to plaintiff's raising before the trial court the arguments it presses on appeal concerning whether it must demonstrate that it was the procuring cause to prevail on its claim for fees, there is no basis for an appeal here. Plaintiff does not seek to disturb the motion court's dispositive rulings but asks us essentially to "reverse" certain statements made by the court in dicta.