From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Yehl (In re Yehl)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2011
90 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-1

In the Matter of Michael A. YEHL, an Attorney.Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner;Michael A. Yehl, Respondent.

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Michael A. Yehl, Ithaca, respondent pro se.


Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael G. Gaynor of counsel), for petitioner. Michael A. Yehl, Ithaca, respondent pro se.

Before: SPAIN, J.P., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department in 1995. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Ithaca, Tompkins County.

Respondent admits the charges and specifications set forth in the petition, and we have heard him in mitigation. As alleged, respondent neglected a client matter, failed to communicate with the client, attempted to mislead and deceive petitioner and failed to cooperate with petitioner's investigation ( see Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0] rules 1.3[b]; 1.4, 8.4 [c], [d], [h] ).

In mitigation, respondent expresses regret for his misconduct and raises certain mental health issues. He also offers to reimburse his client the fees that were advanced to him. In aggravation, we note that petitioner issued a letter of caution to respondent in 2008 for similar misconduct.

Under all of the circumstances presented, and in order to protect the public, deter similar misconduct and preserve the reputation of the bar, we conclude that respondent should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. Upon any application for reinstatement, respondent shall, in addition to the required showing set forth in this Court's rules ( see 22 NYCRR 806.12[b] ), submit a medical report supporting his capacity to resume the practice of law and documentation establishing that he has reimbursed the fees that were paid to him, less any amounts already expended on the client's behalf.

ORDERED that respondent is found guilty of the professional misconduct as set forth in the petition; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, effective 20 days from the date of this decision, and until further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys ( see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

SPAIN, J.P., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Yehl (In re Yehl)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 1, 2011
90 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Yehl (In re Yehl)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael A. YEHL, an Attorney.Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 1, 2011

Citations

90 A.D.3d 1139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
933 N.Y.S.2d 624
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8714

Citing Cases

In re Musafiri

Turning to the issue of an appropriate disciplinary sanction, we take note of respondent's failure to respond…

In re Ebrahimzadeh

The Committee on Professional Standards now moves pursuant to Rules of the Appellate Division, Third…