From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comiskey v. Blitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 3, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are material issues of fact which require a trial ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]). Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Comiskey v. Blitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 1996
228 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Comiskey v. Blitz

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR COMISKEY, Respondent, v. ANNIE BLITZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 413

Citing Cases

In re Borges

However, the movant does not shift the burden to the opposing party, by way of a reply affidavit, to respond…