From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 1986
516 A.2d 328 (Pa. 1986)

Opinion

Argued January 24, 1986.

Decided October 16, 1986.

Appeal No. 63 Eastern District Appeal Docket, 1985, from the Order of the Superior Court, at No. 1166, Philadelphia, 1982, Dated November 9, 1984, Vacating Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Trial Division, Criminal section, at No. 16, March Sessions, 1970 335 Pa. Super. 323, 484 A.2d 155 (1984).

Eric B. Henson, Deputy Dist. Atty., Robert B. Lawler, Chief/Appeal Div., Gaele M. Barthold, Chief/Prosecution Appeals, Ann C. Lebowitz, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Michael J. Byrne, Jr., Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.


OPINION OF THE COURT


For the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Harper, 512 Pa. 155, 516 A.2d 319 (1986), filed contemporaneously with this decision, the order of Superior Court, 335 Pa. Super. 323, 484 A.2d 155, is reversed and judgment of sentence reinstated.

PAPADAKOS, J., files a concurring opinion in which LARSEN, J., joins.

McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.


I concur with the reversal of the Opinion and Order of Superior Court and the reinstatement of the judgment of sentence. For the reasons stated in my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. Harper, 512 Pa. 155, 516 A.2d 319 (1986), filed contemporaneously herewith, I would take this opportunity to overrule Commonwealth v. Tarver, 493 Pa. 320, 426 A.2d 569 (1981).

LARSEN, J., joins in this concurring opinion.


Summaries of

Com. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 1986
516 A.2d 328 (Pa. 1986)
Case details for

Com. v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Gregory Aaron THOMAS, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 16, 1986

Citations

516 A.2d 328 (Pa. 1986)
516 A.2d 328

Citing Cases

Com. v. Tenner

We conclude, based on the foregoing, that the issue of due diligence may not be relitigated under the guise…

Com. v. Curtin

We conclude, as did the PCHA court, that this issue may not be relitigated under the guise of ineffective…