From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Parker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 1980
419 A.2d 748 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1979.

Filed April 25, 1980.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Butler County, Criminal Division, C.A. No. 409 of 1978, Kiester, J.

Richard E. Goldinger, Butler, for appellant.

Robert F. Hawk, Assistant District Attorney, Butler, submitted a brief on behalf of the Commonwealth, appellee.

Before SPAETH, HOFFMAN and VAN der VOORT, JJ.


After appellant pleaded guilty to burglary and theft the lower court sentenced him to the State Correctional Institution at Camp Hill for a term not to exceed three years. When informed by an official at Camp Hill that the institution would not accept appellant under that sentence, the lower court, without notifying appellant, modified its sentence to provide for an indeterminate term as required under 61 P. S. § 485. The court's modification of the sentence without notice to appellant was an improper procedure. See 12 Pa.C.S.A. § 1032; Commonwealth v. Horsman, 239 Pa. Super. 534, 361 A.2d 433 (1976). Because of this improper procedure appellant's second sentence must be vacated. Moreover, because the officials at Camp Hill apparently will not accept appellant under the original sentence, that sentence too must be vacated as it will not serve the lower court's announced purpose, i.e., confinement of appellant at Camp Hill. But see 61 P. S. § 486.

Appellant's sentences are vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

HOFFMAN, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Com. v. Parker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 1980
419 A.2d 748 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
Case details for

Com. v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Steven L. PARKER, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 25, 1980

Citations

419 A.2d 748 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1980)
419 A.2d 748

Citing Cases

Com. v. Hobson

It is well-established that a criminal defendant and his attorney should be present during all aspects of…

Com. v. Craig

In that case, the court applied the Sentencing Code in reviewing of defendant's excessiveness of sentence…