From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Jones

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 1975
334 A.2d 689 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975)

Opinion

December 4, 1974.

March 31, 1975.

Criminal Law — Practice — New trial.

Before WATKINS, P.J., JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, and SPAETH, JJ.

Appeal, No. 637, Oct. T., 1974, from judgment of sentence of Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, April T., 1973, No. 879, in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Arthur Jones. Judgment of sentence reversed and matter remanded for new trial.

Indictment charging defendant with robbery. Before CIRILLO, J.

Plea of guilty entered and judgment of sentence entered thereon. Defendant appealed.

Calvin S. Drayer, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Stewart J. Greenleaf and J. David Bean, Assistant District Attorneys, William T. Nicholas, First Assistant District Attorney, and Milton O. Moss, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.


Submitted December 4, 1974.


The judgment of sentence is hereby reversed and this matter is remanded to the lower court for a new trial due to the unavailability of any trial transcript which might permit meaningful review. Mayer v. City of Chicago, 404 U.S. 189 (1971); Commonwealth v. Goldsmith, 452 Pa. 22 (1973); Commonwealth v. Norman, 447 Pa. 515 (1972).


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Jones

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 31, 1975
334 A.2d 689 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth v. Jones, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 31, 1975

Citations

334 A.2d 689 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975)
334 A.2d 689

Citing Cases

Com. v. McKendrick

The law does not require trial counsel to call to the witness stand every witness mentioned by a defendant.…

Com. v. Dixon

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that meaningful appellate review requires a full…