From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 20, 2009
982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 302 EAL 2009.

October 20, 2009.

Petition No. 302 EAL 2009 for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did the Superior Court override controlling authority establishing that in a joint trial, where the Commonwealth properly redacted a co-defendant's statement and did not use it to directly establish defendant's guilt, and where the trial court properly instructed the jury regarding that statement, the narrow exception to the presumption that a jury will follow its instructions established in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), does not apply?


Summaries of

Com. v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 20, 2009
982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Com. v. Cannon

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Ernest CANNON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

982 A.2d 1218 (Pa. 2009)
982 A.2d 1218