From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Breitegan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 1983
500 Pa. 384 (Pa. 1983)

Summary

determining the compulsory joinder rule did not preclude the prosecution of misdemeanors after a defendant's guilty plea to three summary traffic offenses arising from the same episode

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Perfetto

Opinion

Argued December 7, 1982.

Decided March 8, 1983.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County, No. 1707 of 1978, W. Hensel Brown, J.

Michael H. Ranck, Dist. Atty., John A. Kenneff, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant.

John F. Pyfer, Jr., Howard Knisley, Lancaster, for appellee.

Before O'BRIEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT and HUTCHINSON, JJ.


OPINION


On July 4, 1978 appellee, Zoe Ann Breitegan, was involved in a motor vehicle accident, as a result of which the driver of another vehicle involved was killed. Three traffic citations were issued under the Motor Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 101, et seq., and Ms. Breitegan was charged with the misdemeanors of operating a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731, homicide by vehicle, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3732, and involuntary manslaughter, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2504.

Driving too fast for conditions, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3361; Reckless driving, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3714; and Driving to the left of center, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3301.

Appellee filed a motion in the Court of Common Pleas to quash the information for the misdemeanors on the grounds of her plea to the three summary offenses. The Court of Common Pleas dismissed the motion to quash. On appeal, the Superior Court reversed the Court of Common Pleas and quashed the information on the basis of our compulsory joinder rule and Section 110 of the Crimes Code. 18 C.P. S.A. § 110.

Under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 6502(b) the penalty for the instant summary offenses was Twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars.

We have held in Commonwealth v. Beatty, 500 Pa. 284, 455 A.2d 1194 (1983) that the compulsory joinder rule and Section 110 do not apply to prior summary convictions for traffic violations under the Motor Vehicle Code. Accordingly, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed and the Order of the Court of Common Pleas is reinstated.

Former Chief Justice O'Brien did not participate in the decision of this case.

LARSEN, J., concurs in the result. See Commonwealth v. Beatty, 500 Pa. 284, 293, 455 A.2d 1194, 1199, LARSEN, J. concurring (1983).

FLAHERTY, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Com. v. Breitegan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Mar 8, 1983
500 Pa. 384 (Pa. 1983)

determining the compulsory joinder rule did not preclude the prosecution of misdemeanors after a defendant's guilty plea to three summary traffic offenses arising from the same episode

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Perfetto

In Breitegan, we cited Beatty for the proposition that "the compulsory joinder rule and Section 110 do not apply to prior summary convictions for traffic violations under the Motor Vehicle Code."

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Geyer
Case details for

Com. v. Breitegan

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Zoe Ann BREITEGAN, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 8, 1983

Citations

500 Pa. 384 (Pa. 1983)
456 A.2d 1340

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Perfetto

The phrase, "within the jurisdiction of a single court" was consistently interpreted by our Supreme Court to…

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Nevertheless, in a series of subsequent decisions, and in a departure from the policy judgment of the Campana…