From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colonial Discount Co., Inc. v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1939
257 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Opinion

June 12, 1939.


Order denying the judgment debtor's motion to vacate an order dated May 14, 1938, directing the issuance of a garnishee execution and directing the sheriff of Kings county or H.C. Bohack Company, Inc., or both, to pay to him fifty-four dollars, collected pursuant to the order, modified by striking out all the ordering paragraphs, except the last two, and adding a provision that the judgment creditor is entitled to the nineteen dollars collected by the sheriff under the execution, and the judgment debtor is entitled to the thirty-five dollars deducted by H.C. Bohack Company, Inc., from his wages. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. While a discharge in bankruptcy frees the wages of the bankrupt earned subsequent to the adjudication from the effect of a garnishee execution, in the instant case the sheriff, subsequent to the adjudication, collected moneys under an execution which was valid and enforceable, as it had not been modified and the sheriff had not been stayed. Those moneys, amounting to nineteen dollars, belong to the judgment creditor. ( Ulner v. Doran, 167 App. Div. 259, 262.) The moneys, amounting to thirty-five dollars, deducted from the judgment debtor's wages by H.C. Bohack Company, Inc., his employer, but not collected by the sheriff, belong to the judgment debtor. ( Brenen v. Dahlstrom Metallic Door Co., 189 App. Div. 685.) Lazansky, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Colonial Discount Co., Inc. v. Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 12, 1939
257 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)
Case details for

Colonial Discount Co., Inc. v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:COLONIAL DISCOUNT CO., INC., Respondent, v. FREDERICK MERVIN MILLER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 12, 1939

Citations

257 App. Div. 969 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Szigyarto v. Szigyarto

The company has now collapsed and cannot remit any of the withheld moneys to the Support Collection Unit. ¶…

Refrigeration Air Conditioning Inst. v. Imperato

Applying the construction given by the Federal courts, this court holds that the debt having been…