From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 3, 2017
153 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

08-03-2017

In the Matter of Gerard JENKINS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Gerard Jenkins, Auburn, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Gerard Jenkins, Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. Given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Tafari v. Annucci, 148 A.D.3d 1438, 1439, 48 N.Y.S.3d 647 [2017] ). We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary determination should also be restored (see Matter of Hines v. Venettozzi, 148 A.D.3d 1444, 1445, 49 N.Y.S.3d 584 [2017] ). Finally, inasmuch as the record discloses that petitioner was assessed a $15 reduced filing fee, that amount should be refunded to him (see Matter of Bailey v. Annucci, 147 A.D.3d 1127, 1128, 45 N.Y.S.3d 815 [2017] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs, but with disbursements in the amount of $15.

PETERS, P.J., EGAN JR., DEVINE, AARONS and RUMSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Aug 3, 2017
153 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Gerard JENKINS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 3, 2017

Citations

153 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
153 A.D.3d 992
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 6018

Citing Cases

Rucano v. Annucci

Contrary to petitioner's contentions, he has no right to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the…