From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jan 28, 2015
5:14CV00344 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jan. 28, 2015)

Opinion

5:14CV00344 DPM/JTR

01-28-2015

STACIE COLLINS, ADC #712348 PLAINTIFF v. LON WATSON, Corporal, Tucker Unit Boot Camp, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, a Brief in Support, and a Statement of Undisputed Facts. Doc. 21. Plaintiff must respond to that Motion.

At the summary judgment stage, a plaintiff cannot rest upon mere allegations and, instead, must meet proof with proof. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e). This means that Plaintiff's Response must include her legal arguments, as well as affidavits, prison records, or other evidence establishing that there is a genuine issue of material fact that must be resolved at a hearing or trial.

The affidavit must be based upon the personal knowledge of the person executing the affidavit and must be either: (1) sworn and subscribed to by a notary public; or (2) executed under penalty of perjury, as provided for by 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

Furthermore, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1, Plaintiff must also separately file a Statement of Disputed Facts, which lists: (a) any disagreement she has with the specifically numbered factual assertions in Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. 23); and (b) any other disputed facts that she believes must be resolved at a hearing or trial.

If Plaintiff disputes any of the facts in Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Facts, she must identify each numbered paragraph that contains the facts she disputes and, for each paragraph, explain why she disputes those facts.
--------

Finally, Plaintiff is advised that if she intends to rely on documents that have been previously filed in the record, she must specifically refer to those documents by docket number, page, date, and heading. The Court will not sift through the file to find support for Plaintiff's factual contentions. See Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific, Corp., 355 F.3d 1112, 1113-14 (8th Cir. 2004) (affirming the grant of summary judgment because a plaintiff failed to properly refer to specific pages of the record that supported his position).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff must file, on or before February 27, 2015, a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that comply with the Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order.

2. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in: (a) all of the facts in Defendants' summary judgment papers being deemed admitted by Plaintiff, pursuant to Local Rule 56.1(c); or (b) the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

Dated this 28th day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Collins v. Watson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Jan 28, 2015
5:14CV00344 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jan. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Collins v. Watson

Case Details

Full title:STACIE COLLINS, ADC #712348 PLAINTIFF v. LON WATSON, Corporal, Tucker Unit…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

5:14CV00344 DPM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Jan. 28, 2015)