From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Kennebec Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 19, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-69-GZS (D. Me. Sep. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cv-69-GZS

09-19-2012

KEVIN J. COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. KENNEBEC COUNTY JAIL, et al, Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING THE

RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 33) filed May 31, 2012, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED .

Accordingly, it is ORDERED :

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 19) is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED.
3. The sole remaining state law claims under the Maine Freedom of Access statute and the claims against Defendant Aramark, Inc. are REMANDED to State Court. Service as to Defendant Aramark, Inc. was completed on September 13, 2012 pursuant to this Court's June 12, 2012 Procedural Order. However, the Court concludes that there is no independent basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining claims and the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).

George Z. Singal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Collins v. Kennebec Cnty. Jail

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 19, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-69-GZS (D. Me. Sep. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Collins v. Kennebec Cnty. Jail

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN J. COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. KENNEBEC COUNTY JAIL, et al, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Sep 19, 2012

Citations

No. 1:12-cv-69-GZS (D. Me. Sep. 19, 2012)