From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Jamaica Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 1993
195 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion


195 A.D.2d 534 600 N.Y.S.2d 729 James J. COLLINS, etc., Respondent, v. JAMAICA HOSPITAL, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. Supreme Court of New York, Second Department July 19, 1993.

        Bowers&s Gardner, New York City (Howard R. Cohen, of counsel), for appellant Jamaica Hosp.

        Jones Hirsch Connorss&sBull, New York City (Louise H. Hayes and Mercedes Cajigal, of counsel), for appellant Garcia A. Jean.

        Henry Conan Caron, New York City, for respondent.

        Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and EIBER, PIZZUTO and JOY, JJ.

        MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

        In a medical malpractice action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering of the decedent and wrongful death, the defendants Garcia A. Jean and Jamaica Hospital appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (DiTucci, J.), dated May 29, 1991, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering.

        ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the appellants' motions are granted, and the cause of action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering is dismissed.

        The affidavits of two doctors and the attached anesthesia report of the plaintiff submitted by the appellants were sufficient to make out a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether the plaintiff's decedent was rendered unconscious from the administration of the anesthetic and remained so until her death (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 508 N.Y.S.2d 923, 501 N.E.2d 572; Simms v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 192 A.D.2d 700, 597 N.Y.S.2d 113; Schaefer v. Marchiano, 193 A.D.2d 664, 597 N.Y.S.2d 470). The plaintiff's submission of only her attorney's affirmation was insufficient to rebut the appellants' showing and to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, Schaefer v. Marchiano, supra; Whalen v. Victory Mem. Hosp., 187 A.D.2d 503, 589 N.Y.S.2d 590; Dodes v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 149 A.D.2d 455, 539 N.Y.S.2d 954).

Summaries of

Collins v. Jamaica Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 1993
195 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Collins v. Jamaica Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JAMES J. COLLINS, as Public Administrator of the Estate of MURIEL JAMES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 19, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 534 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 729

Citing Cases

MANESSIS v. CHANG-NAM SONG

The branch of the motion seeking to dismiss the conscious pain and suffering claims is denied as the movants…

Forte v. Sisters of Charity Medical Center

49 NY2d 557). The plaintiff has failed to offer any expert affirmation regarding the alleged causation or…