From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Holinka

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 6, 2008
07-cv-130-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 6, 2008)

Opinion

07-cv-130-bbc.

June 6, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a notice of appeal of this court's May 22, 2008 judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. His notice of appeal is not accompanied by the $455 filing fee. Therefore, I construe his notice to include a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

Petitioner's appeal is not subject to the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act. See Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 628-629 (7th Cir. 2000) ("the PLRA does not apply to any requests for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254, or 2255"). Nevertheless, in determining whether a petitioner is eligible for indigent status on appeal under § 1915, the court must find both that the petitioner does not have the means to pay the $455 fee for filing his appeal and that the appeal is taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (3). I do not intend to certify that petitioner's appeal is not taken in good faith.

In determining whether a habeas corpus petitioner is eligible for pauper status financially, it is my practice to apply the formula set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Specifically, from the petitioner's trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his appeal, I add the deposits made to petitioner's account and calculate 20% of the greater of the average monthly deposits or the average monthly balance in the account. If the 20% figure is more than the fee petitioner owes for filing his appeal, he may not proceed in forma pauperis. If the 20% figure is less than $455, he must prepay whatever portion of the fee the calculation yields.

I cannot tell whether petitioner qualifies for indigent status on appeal because he has not submitted a trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his notice of appeal. Therefore, I will stay a decision on petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pending his submission of the necessary trust fund account statement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that a decision whether petitioner may proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is STAYED. Petitioner may have until June 27, 2008, in which to submit a trust fund account statement for the six-month period beginning approximately November 27, 2007 and ending approximately May 27, 2008. If, by June 27, 2008, petitioner fails to submit the necessary trust fund account statement, I will deny his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal for his failure to show that he is entitled to indigent status on appeal.


Summaries of

Collins v. Holinka

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 6, 2008
07-cv-130-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Collins v. Holinka

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY MARVIN COLLINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN CAROL HOLINKA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 6, 2008

Citations

07-cv-130-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 6, 2008)