From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collado v. C C Cattle Co., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 29, 1982
415 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1536.

June 29, 1982.

Appeal from the Dade County Circuit Court, Rhea Pincus Grossman, J.

Goldstein Professional Ass'n and Caron Balkany Goldstein, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and JORGENSON, JJ.


We reverse the order of the trial court granting defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e), since it affirmatively appears from this record that notice of taking of the defendant's deposition was filed five days prior to the filing of the motion to dismiss. The computation of the time period is based on the one-year period prior to the filing of the motion to dismiss. American Salvage and Jobbing Company, Inc. v. Salomon, 367 So.2d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Flack v. Kuhn, 277 So.2d 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); see also Barnes v. Ross, 386 So.2d 812 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Reversed.


Summaries of

Collado v. C C Cattle Co., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 29, 1982
415 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Collado v. C C Cattle Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE COLLADO, APPELLANT, v. C C CATTLE COMPANY, INC., AND JOSEPH L…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 29, 1982

Citations

415 So. 2d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Scharlin v. Broward Cty. Property

We reject the appellees' contention that the date of service determines the time of the last record activity.…

Gelb v. Miranda

The interpretation is relatively simple. If sufficient record activity occurs during the one-year period…