From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colin v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:10cv740-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CIV. ACT. NO. 2:10cv740-TMH

06-07-2012

MICKEY COLIN, #207739, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

On May 14, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 33). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that the defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED, that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, and that the costs of this proceeding be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff.

___________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Colin v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Jun 7, 2012
CIV. ACT. NO. 2:10cv740-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Colin v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:MICKEY COLIN, #207739, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

CIV. ACT. NO. 2:10cv740-TMH (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

Golston v. Hetzel

The policy applicable to the challenged processing fee became effective on September 1, 2010 and permitted…

Barfield v. Hetzel

The policy applicable to the challenged processing fee became effective on September 1, 2010 and permitted…