From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 24, 1995
908 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 67588.

October 24, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY; JOHN L. ANDERSON, JUDGE.

Emmett D. Queener, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, John M. Morris, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and WHITE, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Coleman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 24, 1995
908 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Coleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:JASON COLEMAN, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 24, 1995

Citations

908 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

State v. Morgan

But, contrary to Morgan's claim, "[s]erious physical harm may be shown by testimony of medical treatment."…

State v. Garner

" 'Serious physical harm may be shown by testimony of medical treatment.' " State v. Morgan, 2d Dist. Clark…