From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Carrington Mortg. Servs.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 26, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-231 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-231

12-26-2019

CHERYL COLEMAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC, ET AL.


(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 3, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #38) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #32) be denied and Plaintiff Cheryl Coleman be ordered to file an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff filed no objections to the Magistrate Judge's report, electing instead to proceed with filing an Amended Complaint (Dkt. #39).

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #32) is DENIED and Plaintiff Cheryl Coleman's Amended Complaint (Dkt. #39) is deemed properly filed before the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 26th day of December, 2019.

/s/_________

AMOS L. MAZZANT


Summaries of

Coleman v. Carrington Mortg. Servs.

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Dec 26, 2019
Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-231 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Coleman v. Carrington Mortg. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:CHERYL COLEMAN v. CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES LLC, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 26, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:19-CV-231 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 26, 2019)

Citing Cases

Newton v. BBVA

Rule 12(b)(4) is the proper challenge when a defendant “alleges that the summons and complaint do not…

Booe v. Alecto Healthcare Servs.

. This rule is the “proper challenge when the respondent alleges that the summons and complaint do not…