From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coleman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Mar 31, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-931 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-931

03-31-2017

JEFFREY COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


OPINION & ORDER
[Resolving Doc. 1] :

Plaintiff Jeffrey Coleman brings claims for wrongful denial of Period of Disability, Disability Insurance Benefits, and Supplemental Security Income.

Doc. 1.

On December 21, 2012, Administrative Law Judge Sara L. Alston held a hearing on Coleman's benefits application. The ALJ found that Plaintiff Coleman was not disabled and denied the application. On March 5, 2014, the Appeals Council remanded for further proceedings because the hearing decision did not account for Coleman's mental impairments in its Residual Functional Capacity (RFC) Assessment and failed to evaluate Coleman's obesity.

Doc. 9 at 49-109.

Id. at 172.

Id. at 191-94.

On June 6, 2014, Administrative Law Judge Penny Loucas held a second hearing. The ALJ found that Plaintiff Coleman was not disabled and denied the application. The ALJ's decision became final on February 19, 2016, when the Appeals Council declined further review.

Id. at 21-48.

Id. at 195-212.

Id. at 5-9.

On February 17, 2017, Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this Court affirm the Administrative Law Judge's denial of benefits. The parties have failed to file objections by the deadline, March 3, 2017.

Doc. 13 at 1.

The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection.

Absent objection, a district court may adopt the Magistrate Judge's report without review. Moreover, having conducted its own review of the complaint and administrative record, the Court agrees with the conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). --------

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Greenberg's findings of fact and conclusions of law and incorporates them fully herein by reference. This Court ADOPTS the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and AFFIRMS the ALJ's denial of benefits.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2017

s/ James S . Gwin

JAMES S. GWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Coleman v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Mar 31, 2017
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-931 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Coleman v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY COLEMAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Mar 31, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-931 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2017)

Citing Cases

Hedges v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Federal courts, including those within the Sixth Circuit, disagree "'whether an ALJ's failure to follow…