From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cole v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 4, 2011
Civ. No. 10-510-CL (D. Or. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 10-510-CL.

November 4, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (#21), and the matter is now before this court.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I conclude the R R is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#21) is adopted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cole v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Nov 4, 2011
Civ. No. 10-510-CL (D. Or. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Cole v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WANETA COLE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 10-510-CL (D. Or. Nov. 4, 2011)

Citing Cases

Parker v. Colvin

Admin. R. 82, 84. The VE's testimony based on this information obtained from Job Browser Pro was reliable and…

Leslie v. Colvin

For this reason, Leslie's citation to approval by other courts and potential use by the Commissioner is…