From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 3, 1996
686 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-03520.

January 3, 1996.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140 (g) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Brandt C. Downey, III, Judge.


Frederick R. Coker appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence in which he raised two issues. We affirm that part of the order confirming Coker's entitlement to gain time. Further, we affirm the denial of Coker's motion concerning his habitualization in case number 89-12258 since that issue is not cognizable in a motion to correct illegal sentence. Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, our affirmance of that aspect of the trial court's order is without prejudice to Coker filing a properly sworn and timely motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

Affirmed without prejudice.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 3, 1996
686 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Coker v. State

Case Details

Full title:FREDRICK R. COKER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 3, 1996

Citations

686 So. 2d 4 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Perry v. State

AFFIRMED. See State v. Callaway, 658 So.2d 983 (Fla. 1995); Coker v. State, 686 So.2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996);…