From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coker v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 31, 1976
535 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1976)

Opinion

No. B-5784.

March 31, 1976.

Appeal from the 82nd District Court, Falls County, W. C. Wallace, J.

Robert G. Carter, Marlin, for petitioner.

John M. Hand, Marlin, Robert A. Canonico, Waco, for respondents.


The Court of Civil Appeals ( 531 S.W.2d 204) has properly followed the rule of Smith v. Columbian Carbon Co., 145 Tex. 478, 198 S.W.2d 727 (1947), and allowed a non-suit sought in the trial court by the plaintiffs prior to announcement by the judge in open court that defendant's motion for instructed verdict would be granted. Under the rule in effect when this case was tried and when the Court of Civil Appeals opinion was written, the plaintiffs had the right to take the non-suit even though all parties had closed the presentation of evidence and the judge had informed them in chambers of his intention to grant the defendant's motion. The application is therefore refused, no reversible error. It should be noted that Rule 164, Tex.Rules Civ.Proc., as amended January 1, 1976, now allows plaintiff the right to a non-suit only until his own case-in-chief is rested.


Summaries of

Coker v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Texas
Mar 31, 1976
535 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1976)
Case details for

Coker v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:Clyde COKER, Petitioner, v. Ray MITCHELL and Max Atkins, Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Mar 31, 1976

Citations

535 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1976)

Citing Cases

Stanzel v. O'Brien

"Upon the trial of any case at any time before plaintiff has rested his case, i.e, has introduced all of his…

Chase Comm Corp v. Datapont Corp.

Sanchez, 651 S.W.2d at 254. Procedural rules in effect at the time of trial have been held applicable on…