From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coile v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 18, 1968
212 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Summary

In Coile v. State, 212 So.2d 94 (Fla.App. 3rd 1968), defendant was charged with the violation of Section 800.04, Florida Statutes, (lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault or act upon or in the presence of a child), and the trial court reduced the charge to a violation of the second clause of Section 798.02, supra.

Summary of this case from Campbell v. State

Opinion

No. 67-997.

June 18, 1968.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Edward S. Klein, J.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender and Herbert M. Klein, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Arthur L. Rothenberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.


The appellant was charged with a violation of § 800.04, Fla. Stat. (1967), F.S.A., entitled "Lewd, lascivious or indecent assault or act upon or in the presence of child." On motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of the State's case the court reduced the charge to a violation of § 798.02, Fla. Stat. (1967), F.S.A. At the conclusion of the non-jury trial appellant was found guilty and placed on probation for two years; this appeal followed.

"Lewd and lascivious behavior * * * or if any man or woman, married or unmarried, is guilty of open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior, they shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison not exceeding two years, or in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by fine not exceeding three hundred dollars."

Appellant has presented two points on appeal. The first urges that the evidence is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of "open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior," as set forth in § 798.02.

The record contains testimony that the appellant, having consumed some alcohol, conducted himself in a manner which alarmed the adult supervisors of a troop of girl scouts. The girl scouts were having a holiday outing at one of the county beaches. In addition, there is evidence that the appellant approached and touched one of the children. The appellant on this appeal described this contact as a pat or push. The court found from the testimony of the witnesses present that the touching of the child was insufficient to constitute an assault under § 800.04, which prohibits "handl[ing], fondl[ing] or mak[ing] an assault upon any male or female child under the age of fourteen years * * *," but sufficient to constitute a lewd and lascivious act under § 798.02, which prohibits "open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior * * *." We think that this was a question of fact for the trial court to determine. Dickinson v. Geraci, Fla.App. 1966, 190 So.2d 368, 388. We are unable to say as a matter of law that the appellant's conduct was not open and gross lewd and lascivious behavior prohibited by § 798.02.

Appellant's second point is directed to the admission in evidence of two magazines found on the front seat of appellant's car when he was arrested. The trial judge termed them "pretty raw." We think that error has not been demonstrated. In Williams v. State, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 654, 662, the Supreme Court of Florida held: "Nonetheless, relevancy is the test. If found to be relevant for any purpose save that of proving bad character or propensity, then it should be admitted." Possession of the magazines alone did not constitute lewd and lascivious behavior. But we think that possession of the magazines at the time and place the acts complained of occurred was a circumstance relevant to a determination of the guilt or innocence of the appellant.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Coile v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 18, 1968
212 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

In Coile v. State, 212 So.2d 94 (Fla.App. 3rd 1968), defendant was charged with the violation of Section 800.04, Florida Statutes, (lewd, lascivious, or indecent assault or act upon or in the presence of a child), and the trial court reduced the charge to a violation of the second clause of Section 798.02, supra.

Summary of this case from Campbell v. State
Case details for

Coile v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL B. COILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 18, 1968

Citations

212 So. 2d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

There have been only three reported appellate opinions construing the second clause of Section 798.02,…

Wilson v. State

There was sufficient relevancy between the pornographic evidence, its location, and the circumstances of the…