Summary
affirming the district court's dismissal of a prisoner's equal protection claim - alleging he was treated differently than inmates sentenced under the new legislation - because he failed to show that "criminals convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment on the same date as [him] received a determinative sentence under the Act for parole eligibility purposes, as required for an equal protection claim."
Summary of this case from Shields v. SmithOpinion
99-6028.
August 13, 1999.
Appeal from W.D.Okla.
Decisions without Published Opinions Appeal Dismissed.