From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofer v. Turman

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
258 S.E.2d 922 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57615.

ARGUED APRIL 4, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.

Driver's license revocation. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge McKenzie.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Russell N. Sewell, Jr., Daryl A. Robinson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellant.

William R. Parker, for appellee.


Appellant Cofer complains of the trial court's exclusion of certain documentary evidence. However, the proffered evidence has not been made part of the record, and we therefore have nothing to review. "A basic rule of appellate procedure is that no appellate court can rule on the exclusion of evidence unless it is aware of what was excluded." 11 EGL 304, Evidence, § 10 (Civil) (1979 Rev.); Wood v. Hamilton, 109 Ga. App. 608 (5) ( 137 S.E.2d 61) (1964).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.


ARGUED APRIL 4, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.


Summaries of

Cofer v. Turman

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
258 S.E.2d 922 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Cofer v. Turman

Case Details

Full title:COFER v. TURMAN

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 4, 1979

Citations

258 S.E.2d 922 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
258 S.E.2d 922

Citing Cases

Dekalb County v. Daniels

`A basic rule of appellate procedure is that no appellate court can rule on the exclusion of evidence unless…

Choi v. Wan

Appellant enumerates as error the exclusion of several photographs. However, the excluded photographs were…