From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coddington v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1992
183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 7, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. Greenfield, J.).


Petitioners, Secretaries to Judges (JG-14) employed in the Nassau County District Court, were not directly affected by the Chief Administrative Judge's reclassification of secretaries in the Family, County and Surrogate's Courts mandated in Matter of Bellacosa v. Classification Review Bd. ( 72 N.Y.2d 383), and thus there is no basis for their argument that it would be futile for them to seek reclassification through administrative channels.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Coddington v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1992
183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Coddington v. Crosson

Case Details

Full title:JOANNE CODDINGTON et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Secretaries to…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 376

Citing Cases

O'Neill v. Pfau

Additionally, the party seeking the benefit of the defense "bears the burden of establishing by prima facie…

O'Neill v. Pfau

Additionally, the party seeking the benefit of the defense "bears the burden of establishing by prima facie…