From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coco v. Heck Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3059 (W.D. La. Mar. 17, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3059

03-17-2014

CARL COCO, et al v. HECK INDUSTRIES, INC.


U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DRELL


U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to remand, doc. #9, is GRANTED and this case is remanded to the 12th Judicial District Court, Parish of Avoyelles, State of Louisiana.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, in Alexandria, Louisiana, on this 17th day of March, 2014.

___________________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Coco v. Heck Indus., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Mar 17, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3059 (W.D. La. Mar. 17, 2014)
Case details for

Coco v. Heck Indus., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARL COCO, et al v. HECK INDUSTRIES, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 17, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-3059 (W.D. La. Mar. 17, 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Goauto Ins. Co.

Cases in this Circuit in which courts have applied the commonsense presumption include class definitions that…

Stewart v. Ruston La. Hosp. Co.

Id. at 368. See also, e.g., Hollinger v. Home State Mut. Ins. Co., 654 F.3d 564, 572 (5th Cir. 2011)…